A Conversation with January Gill O’Neil—WSR Contributing Poetry Editor

Water~Stone Review is a collaborative project of students, faculty, and staff at Hamline University Creative Writing Programs. In addition to working with our faculty, and to fulfill a larger initiative of providing a place for new/emerging and underrepresented voices at Water~Stone Review, we now have rotating contributing editor positions. 

This is a wonderful opportunity for our graduate student assistant editors to collaborate with renown writers in order to expand our reach and  further innovation. Past Contributing Editors include Sun Yung Shin, Keith Lesmeister, Sean Hill, Carolyn Holbrook, Mona Power, Kao Kalia Yang, and Ed Bok Lee. 

In this post we introduce Vol. 26 Contributing Poetry Editor, January Gill O’Neil.

What do you hope to achieve through your work as a contributing editor in Volume 26?

Put simply, I want to create a solid collection of poems to complement the solid collection of poems that Water~Stone creates with each issue. I’m looking forward to seeing the range of subjects that bubble up. What are we concerned with as a society? What are our obsessions? 

What makes a poem exceptional? 

Poems that make me feel like after I read them, I wish I wrote them. Poetry can be improvisational in a way, so I’m looking to see how poets navigate their universes. I’m interested in the constellations they create from one moment to the next. What does that look like on the page? That’s a tough question to answer, but I know it when I see it.

I’m also excited to work with Water~Stone’s exceptional staff!

Are there particular poetic themes or forms that particularly interest you?

No. I’d rather see what themes emerge. I think poems are indicators of where we are as a society, so I’m curious about the passions and preoccupations of poets at this current moment. How do they make the ordinary extraordinary?  

What do you envision for the poetry contributions as a whole?

I want this issue to be inclusive and wide-ranging. I’m hoping the collection will tell some larger truth. The possibilities are endless.    

How do you handle rejection and acceptance with your own work?

I roll with it. I grumble to a few close poetry friends and move on. That’s the value of having a community rooting for you. And if you’ve been rejected enough times, you know it’s part of the publication process.  I don’t take it personally.

What are some presses and/or journals you admire, and why? 

Besides Water-Stone Review, I’ve long been an admirer of The American Poetry Review (APR), Ploughshares, Ecotone, and 32 Poems—too many to count, really. I like them because they publish a broad spectrum of poets with each issue. There is wonder in the pages of these mags. I learn something new about myself and the world in each issue.  

What projects are you currently working on?  

I’m working on new poetry that leans toward the environment, as well as a new collection, Glitter Road, coming out in February ’22. I continue to work on projects related to the legacy of Emmett Till, Which is featured in Glitter Road. But I also leave a lot of space for curiosity and wonder. I like to say I am writing toward what I don’t know.

JANUARY GILL O’NEIL is an associate professor at Salem State University, and the author of Rewilding (2018), Misery Islands (2014), and Underlife (2009), all published by CavanKerry Press. From 2012-2018, she served as the executive director of the Massachusetts Poetry Festival, and currently serves on the boards of AWP and Montserrat College of Art. Her poems and articles have appeared in The New York Times Magazine, the Academy of American Poets’ Poem-A-Day series, American Poetry Review, Green Mountains Review, Poetry, and Sierra magazine, among others. Her poem, “At the Rededication of the Emmett Till Memorial,” was a co-winner of the 2022 Allen Ginsberg Poetry award from the Poetry Center at Passaic County Community College. The recipient of fellowships from the Massachusetts Cultural Council, Cave Canem, and the Barbara Deming Memorial Fund, O’Neil was the 2019-2020 John and Renée Grisham Writer-in-Residence at the University of Mississippi, Oxford. O’Neil is one of five judges for the 2022 National Book Award in poetry. She lives with her two children in Beverly, MA. 

 

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Melissa Crowe

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Melissa Crowe

Your poem “Lessons” in Volume 24, lists a series of shocking events that a young person witnessed from extended family members. How has your childhood shaped your poetry? 

This is a big question! I want to start by addressing that word, shocking because, believe it or not, nothing in the poem seems shocking to me. I was a guest in an undergraduate poetry workshop recently, and one of the students asked, rather pointedly, “Why do you write about these awful, painful things?” I said, “Well–these are the stories I have.” 

It’s a little like looking in the refrigerator, hungry, and finding what seems like meager ingredients. Hopefully you manage a meal that satisfies, and on occasion you wind up with something surprisingly delicious. I’m working with what’s at hand, and by the time I’ve written a poem–spent weeks or months or, in some cases, years–crafting the thing, it doesn’t hurt anymore, or certainly not as much. In fact, that transformation–from experience to art–is joyful for me. It feels like triumph. 

But of course the reader is encountering this old pain for the first time. I’m fascinated by that dissonance, actually, and I was thinking about it when I wrote “Lessons.” The poem is intended to say something like “These events gave me a particular understanding of human social life, and I carry that understanding forward, but to have been loved so well–gently, abidingly, sweetly–has changed how I see myself, my past, and the world.” It’s a love poem! 

But to answer your question directly, I’ll say this: my childhood shaped my poetry completely, irrevocably, because it shaped me. It taught me that we’re vulnerable to one another’s whims and inheritors of one another’s suffering. It taught me that we live closer to the bone than we might like to recognize and that our survival depends on our willingness to rely upon one another, to care for each other. It taught me the dangers and pleasures of being an animal in the world, and it convinced me of the urgency of seeing and saying the truth. I think–I hope–these lessons are at work in my poems.

I appreciate the turn that happens at the end of “Lessons” as it flips to an ode of sorts for a person whose presence allows the speaker to rise above a difficult childhood with “a carton of Five Alive & a fistful of daisies.” What (or who) was the original inspiration for the poem? 

We have a running joke in my marriage–we continuously evoke “the speaker’s husband.” Mark–to whom this poem is dedicated–is a pretty ferocious protector of my creative freedom, and he often reminds me that poems aren’t nonfiction. Actually, whereas the writer of an essay agrees to tell the truth and a fiction writer claims the story is made up, poetry occupies a liminal space when it comes to the real. Poets aren’t promising facts or refusing them. In my case, I’m using them as raw material and giving myself permission to remember, imagine, invent, all in pursuit of the made thing. My husband isn’t in this poem; the lovely young man with the juice and flowers is the speaker’s husband.

Just between us, though, I’ll say this: I was sixteen when I met Mark, and it was like spotting dry land after a long, hard time at sea. I’m grateful every single day for the good sense I managed back then. Kid-me set me up good! 

I noticed that you wrote a few chapbooks before your first full length collection Dear Terror, Dear Splendor came out in 2019. How did those earlier works prepare you for that full length collection? What has your writing journey been like so far?  

I love chapbooks. They play a vital role in the poetry ecosystem. They allow emerging writers to create a smaller collection before they take the bigger leap, invite folks already publishing books to engage with side projects, and make it possible for small presses to champion work that’s riskier because it is experimental or otherwise outside what the market deems viable. 

My first chapbook collects prose poems I wrote in a flurry when I started teaching and was the mother of a small child. It was hard to find time for creative work, and I started a blog with the aim of writing and posting a poem a day, quickly and without much revision. What came out, not surprisingly, was very different from the poems that arise from my usual practice. My second chapbook, Girl, Giant, is more of a precursor, a place where I incubated my first collection, and many of those poems appear also in Dear Terror, Dear Splendor. 

My practice has always depended a great deal on my circumstances–I had a baby at the tail end of my MFA and was raising a small child during my PhD, so the book I started writing at twenty-three was published two decades later. I thought that meant I was a very slow writer. I am a pretty devoted and meticulous reviser. I live with a poem for a long time before I find myself wanting to publish it, and it’s not unusual for the published version to be drafted thirty-five or forty-seven times. But right around the time Dear Terror, Dear Splendor came out, my kid went off to college, and then I wrote the second book in four years instead of twenty. 

What do I want to say, then, about the journey? I always wanted, since I was maybe fourteen, to live a life in poetry, and I’ve pursued it persistently though not always in ways that look ambitious, and I think that’s because I’ve also chosen to be present in the other parts of my life. I have a full life, and I’m at peace with the ways that poetry moves in and out of the center, sharing space with friendship, activism, teaching, marriage, motherhood. As long as I can feel the poem within reach, I’m happy. 

Congratulations on winning the Iowa Poetry Prize award for your second poetry book Lo, coming out in spring of 2023! What was the process like in creating this poetry book and submitting it for the prize? Did you submit to other contests or presses? What would you recommend to others who are working to get a poetry collection published? 

Thank you! As I said, I wrote this book much more quickly than my first one, largely because I was no longer parenting in the same active, daily way I had been. I was working in an independent creative writing department. Everybody in the building was writing a book! It felt like I better be, too! 

After about three years of writing new poems post-Dear Terror, Dear Splendor, I spent a summer taking stock of how much finished work I actually had. Did it add up to something cohesive? Cut to the bonkers, murder-investigation-style manuscript wall, and then passing the results on to a single, trusted reader, and suddenly, in time for the fall reading periods, it looked like I had a book to submit. 

My plan was to send that version of the manuscript to about a dozen presses, and if it didn’t get picked up, I’d revise and try again. I’d arrived near the end of the cycle–had a few lovely near misses–and was making a revision plan when I got that thrilling call from the University of Iowa Press.

In terms of advice, maybe the main thing I can offer is encouragement to take your time making the poems and building the book, and once you believe it’s strong, identify presses putting out work you love and admire, making books you find physically beautiful and with reputations for treating their authors with respect. 

From there, the hardest part is pursuing publication in the face of rejection, maintaining the confidence necessary to ride it out. For me, this is all made easier by remembering past experiences–so often when I’ve begun to believe a thing is impossible, I learn otherwise. But the bottom line is this: if I’m pursuing a thing I believe in, a thing I have chosen mindfully and with all my heart, I don’t have to keep second guessing myself. I don’t get to make others’ choices–whether or not to publish the thing–but I have made mine, have done my work, and I can feel good about that, no matter the outcome.

Will there be events leading up your publication of Lo that we can look forward to? What is next on the horizon for you as a writer?    

On the run-up to the publication of Lo, I’m doing all the things a poet does to help get the book out: trading notes with the copyeditor, looking at proofs, helping to select cover art, gathering blurbs, and that takes up a lot of headspace and dayspace. Surprisingly, though, I find I’m also writing new poems toward something that already feels like it might be a third book, this time about desire for things we don’t choose. I’m thinking a lot about the word unconsummated. I identify as a bit of a hedonist, so this is new territory. We’ll see! 

MELISSA CROWE is the author of Dear Terror, Dear Splendor (University of Wisconsin Press, 2019) and Lo, winner of the Iowa Poetry Prize and forthcoming from University of Iowa Press in the spring of 2023. Her work has appeared recently or is forthcoming in Image, New England Review, Poetry, and Poetry Northwest, among other journals, and she was the 2021 winner of the Robert H. Winner Memorial Award from the Poetry Society of America. She coordinates the MFA program at UNCW, where she teaches poetry and publishing. 

 

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Zibiquah Denny

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Zibiquah Denny

I really enjoyed your creative nonfiction piece “The Buckskin Dress” in Volume 24 which tells the history of your family through the usage and the making of a dress sewn by your grandmother. Why did you choose to tell this story through the history of the dress? How does the artifact impact the storytelling?     

Originally I was going to write a story on dancing–my mom was a highly respected pow-wow dancer and I inherited her love of dance. Then I read my brother Jack’s college essay on my mom meeting one of his heroes, Ira Hayes. I never knew that story and I knew I had to use it while talking about dance and ceremony. As I thought more and more about the dance and the dress and all the layers it represented, the dress became an important and appropriate vehicle to talk about our family history, culture, love and loss. 

As the story developed, I wanted to include the hunt of the deer, the prayers and ceremonies around the gifts we are blessed with, and the animals who give their lives for our well-being. It all came together after talking with my cousin Alfred. Praying with seyma (tobacco), giving thanks and ceremony are important aspects of our culture. I wanted to show that with this essay.

Your story also references the history of your people, the Potawatomi and Ho-Chunk. What research did you do in writing this piece? How did you decide what to include and what to leave out? 

I read historical books on the Potawatomi and the Ho-Chunk to understand when and where the removals and other major historical events took place. I also read smaller publications from the Wisconsin Historical Society and other tribal publications. I interviewed family members and wrote down some of my own recollections as a child. 

This essay is one story in the memoir I am working on. I wrote an essay on my Naming Ceremony which goes more in-depth into the Potawatomi removal from Wisconsin. I used a broader history for that story because of the intrusion on our religious practices and ceremonies which was a major part of that story. 

The Buckskin Dress did not require much historical context because the dress was worn by family members for various reasons within two generations. I focused on the dress, the making of it, the person who made it and the people who wore it because it made for a more layered and engaging story. I did not want to weigh it down with unnecessary historical facts.

Often when telling family stories, there are contradictions depending on peoples’ different points of view. How did you collect the family stories that are present in the piece? Were there any bumps in the road, or shining moments you’d like to share with us in the gathering of family lore? 

Fortunately most of this story comes from my own recollections as a child and youth. I used to go with my mom to these gigs since I was three years old–at first it was a requirement because I was the youngest and not in school yet. Later as I got to be a teen I chose to go with my mom because I really loved seeing her dance–I developed a love of my own for the dance so it was very helpful for me to watch her move.

I started to dance when I was a young teen. My cousin Alfred was happy to share his stories with me–I appreciated his willingness to not only share his experiences but his good humor. He was nothing but encouraging. I had to include humor in the story because humor is a very important cultural trait and I wanted that to show–I hope everyone understood it. Sometimes we humans take ourselves much too seriously.

You were a former editor of The Circle newspaper, guest editor at Yellow Medicine Review, and currently a contributing editor at Solstice. Do you find editing to be complementary to your writing life? If so, in what ways? 

I do, but not because it is easy. Editing is a very meticulous task but a necessary one to write cohesively. I first write out the story without editing myself because that slows down the flow and can be extremely time consuming. I wait to edit until the story is finished and then go back several times to take out repetitions or unnecessary pieces in the story–details that do not add anything to the main theme. 

Deciding what to leave in or out also requires some thought. So I ask myself what I want to leave with the reader. What do I want them to learn? It is important not to take for granted that the readers will understand everything, especially if you are writing about specific cultural, racial and historical events. That is where a mixed race reading group comes in handy. I have participated in several groups and they have been very helpful. However that is not always possible.

I assume most people do not know certain historical details, so I include them to not  confuse or lose the reader. It is better to be thorough in your telling of any story with a historical or cultural nature.

Do you have any tips for other writers on how to maintain a writing life?  

Stay focused and do not get discouraged. Take the time you need to write whenever you get the chance because it is not always possible, especially if you have a job or children. I do not have a set time that I write. Remember everyone writes differently. Figure out the best time of the day for you to write, but if you cannot get to writing then read. Read everything and not just the genre you are writing in. The more you read the better writer you will become.

What are some books, journals, or writers that you’ve enjoyed reading recently?  

The best book I read on writing is called On Writing by Stephen King. It’s funny and easy to read–he gives great tips for all kinds of writing, I highly recommend it. Isabel Allende is also a favorite writer of mine, her latest book Violeta is a good read; Heavy by Kiese Laymon; Night by Elie Wiesel; Whereas by Layli Long Soldier; The Fact of a Body by Alexandria Marzano-Lesnevich. 

Skunk Hill is a small book published by the Wisconsin Historical Society Press and was an important book for me because the writer interviews many of my family members. They were descendants of the Skunk Hill group of Potawatomies who escaped the reservation in Kansas to practice their religion freely in their homelands of Wisconsin. 

That’s a short list, I try to read a book a week.

What are some projects that you are working on now?

I have been working on more poetry but still mainly working on my memoir. I will have a poem called War Torn History published in the November issue of Solstice magazine.

ZIBIQUAH DENNY is Potawatomi and Ho-Chunk originally from the Great Lakes and woodlands of Wisconsin. She is a storyteller, telling stories that educate by writing from an indigenous cultural and historical perspective with a contemporary voice. Formerly a journalist, she is currently writing creative nonfiction and poetry. She is a recent recipient of a Minnesota State Arts Board grant in which she organized and read for the Custer Had It Coming event in Minneapolis. She guest edited the Spring 2020 issue of Yellow Medicine Review and co-edited the local Voices Rising Journal in 2021 and is now working on a memoir.

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Ramsey Mathews

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Ramsey Mathews

Your poem in Volume 24, “Cold Sweet Tea on a Slow Afternoon at the Waffle House” is visceral and poignant due to the terrifying situation you describe. It is written in direct, clear language. What was your reasoning in telling this poem with concise language? Did the content direct the shape of the poem? 

In 1998, I was robbed at gunpoint in Sherman Oaks (Los Angeles) California. I eventually published the one page poem “Two Guys with Guns Rob Me.” When someone has a loaded handgun, words seem useless. The world shrinks and becomes quite focused when you’re facing a gun. Nothing outside that space is important. 

With the sweet tea poem, I had a similar feeling about being concise. 

“Cold Sweet Tea on a Slow Afternoon at the Waffle House” circulated in my head for quite a while after I read it. The specific details make it easy to visualize. At the same time, I found what was unsaid in the piece to be even more telling. I noticed this in both the poem itself as well as the conversation between the two men at the restaurant. Why do you think what is unsaid creates such a powerful message? 

My first ever creative writing class was a playwriting elective at Georgia State University. When I see two people talking, I create a backstory and dialogue as if I were part of a theater audience. There can exist great dramatic tension between the lines or through what is not said. I purposely created space for the reader’s imagination to fill in the gaps. The waitress’ confession about cheating sets up the dynamic. 

The two guys aren’t enemies. They might talk about relationships, work, families, and life, but too many words would ruin the tension. Once the heat dissipates, I think it’s natural to talk about mundane things, the weather, and sports, to defuse the situation, even with a gun lying in the middle of the table. I left that up to the reader. 

The details in this poem are grounded in time and place which makes me think it could be a true story. If you’d care to divulge, is this something you witnessed and if so why did you choose to tell it through poetry?

Yes, this happened. I was working an afternoon shift as the cook trying to figure out how to increase sales. The waitress and I were the only two people in the restaurant. Thank goodness. 

All these years, I could never pinpoint the genre for this project. For a long time, I leaned toward writing a one-act play. During the fall of 2021, I read The Complete Poems by Anne Sexton. Something in Anne’s poems inspired me to write this poem and ten others. Sexton became my therapist. Never stop reading. 

Nighthawks, by Edward Hopper (1942)

When this event happened, I was nervous, but I never felt in danger. Maybe that was adrenaline or denial. I grew up in rural south Georgia, so I’m familiar with rifles and shotguns. I knew what a 357 Desert Eagle looked like from pictures. A loaded one looks much bigger in real life, especially when the person carrying the gun intends to use it. 

I’ve written several ekphrastic poems. Edward Hopper’s iconic Nighthawks painting stuck with me whenever I thought about making this poem. Although my mental camera lens was always inside the building and never outside looking in through those large glass windows. Maybe this is an ekphrastic poem in which I appear. 

I still eat at Waffle House monthly. I crave hashbrowns scattered, smothered, and covered along with eggs scrambled with cheese. 

In addition to being a poet, you are also a playwright, and a photographer. Do you find that your photography inspires your writing? Do you have any suggestions for people who are interested in developing their own creative outlets? 

I’ve  published two short stories, a few photographs, and a ten-minute play. I was commissioned to write four screenplays. I write fiction and drama to entertain myself. Photography is a fun escape, like a favorite movie or music video. Photography is also my attempt at fine art. 

Most writing programs tell students to focus on one genre. The proverbial ten thousand hours require a lot of time. I believe you should embrace as many creative outlets as you want. Do it for the fun of it. Do it for yourself. Let all your creative outlets nurture you as an artist. Make reading lists. Read craft books. Take a class. Read outside your comfort zone. If you like literary fiction, read sci-fi and vice versa. 

If fiction or playwrighting is your second genre, the Pulitzer site lists the winner and two finalists in each category. That’s 30 works of fiction and 30 stage plays from the last ten years. There’s the National Book Awards, Booker Prize, Nobel Prize, Lambda Literary, and Hugo. Many literary websites post staff favorites. 

As for screenwriting, during Oscars season, the production companies post downloadable PDFs of scripts for Academy consideration. Many are available all year and for several years. There are lots of craft books on screenwriting. Be sure to use the formatting software when writing. 

Study the history and critical theory behind your secondary (and primary) genre. Search the web for MFA and PhD reading lists. Some University websites archive downloadable lists for potential and current students in Gender Studies, Film Theory, African American Lit, Art History, Poetry, Fiction, Drama, Music Theory, Photography, and others. I find that a little dose of critical theory and history primes my creative pump. 

Read every anthology you can get your hands on. Don’t forget to write. 

I’ve watched hours of YouTube videos about camera equipment and photo editing. I’m sure there’s lots of videos about ceramics, dance, sculpture, guitar, and other art forms. 

What projects are you currently working on, or planning for the future? 

I’ve submitted a poetry collection to contests every year for the last four years. Each year, I replace old poems with new ones and change the collection title, which currently is What Was The Question. It includes the Waffle House poem. 10 of 20 contests have said no this year. 

Earlier this year, I read tons of contemplative essays and poetry by Rumi, Rilke, Basho, Issa, Buson, Thomas Merton, Thomas Keating, Eknath Easwaran, BKS Iyengar, and Mary Oliver. I wrote six new contemplative poems that I like, which I’ll include in the next iteration of my collection. Next time, I’ll forgo the contest route and submit directly to publishers. It’s a lot less expensive. I also have a short story collection. I mentioned that two stories are published. It’s probably time for me to edit the other stories and write a few new ones. 

Read widely. Keep writing. Edit. Edit. Edit. Try to have fun.

RAMSEY MATHEWS was born in rural Georgia where he worked in agriculture and played high school football. He wanted to be an astronaut, but calculus fractured that dream. Moving to Los Angeles for film and TV, he did stand-in and stunt work for Patrick Swayze and Ron Perlman, among others. Always a student, Ramsey earned five University degrees: 1) BS in Industrial Management from Georgia Tech, 2) BA in Advanced Composition & Rhetoric from Georgia State University, 3) MA Lit Degree in Modern Drama from Cal State University Northridge, 4) MFA in Poetry from Cal State University, Long Beach, and 5) a PhD in English and Creative Writing from Florida State University with additional focus on African American Poetry and Drama. Ramsey loves black-and-white photography. Follow him on Instagram @ramseymathews and Twitter @dramapoet.

 

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Mona Susan Power

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Mona Susan Power

Your fictional short story in Volume 24, “Iktomi Spins a Web is a fresh take on Iktómi, a trickster spider from Dakota and Lakota traditions. What was your intention behind creating a new story with a traditional character? Are there certain things a writer should take into consideration when reworking elements of traditional tales? 

I honestly don’t choose new writing projects, rather feel as if they choose me. I’ll hear a line in my head or glimpse the flash of an image, and my imagination is off and running! I have to solve the mystery of what the image signifies, or who spoke the line of narration. I not only give myself full permission to follow what comes to me, unbidden, but feel compelled to do so. 

When I was invited to write a short piece for a project on bringing life to an article from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, I was drawn to Article 19 which declares the right to personally own property. Raised as I was to see territory as a relative, this concept of ownership is troubling. No sooner did I have that thought than Iktómi appeared in my head, prepared to take on the issue in an extreme and foolish way. In many stories he teaches us important lessons through his poor decisions or rash actions. Once the story was written, I felt it fit within that tradition. Nothing came of the original project, but I was grateful for the gift of a new piece.

At the beginning of your story, I was immediately intrigued by the viewpoint you gave Iktómi. We aren’t told he is a spider, but through description this becomes evident. I loved how you described his life in a human home eating crumbs and avoiding the vacuum cleaner as well as his perspective of the people who watch “Coyote News all day, every day.” What was your process developing this character with such a unique perspective?  

As soon as I wrote the first line of the story, I was immersed in Iktómi’s perspective, seeing everything through his (many) eyes. It’s difficult to talk about the story process in terms of conscious development since it’s a story that just flew out of my fingers as I typed. One picture in my head led to another and another. I didn’t purposely withhold the information that he is a spider, but viewing the world from his point of view, there was no need to make mention since we ordinary folks don’t introduce ourselves to one another by stating that we’re human. 

What partly inspired this slice of Iktómi’s life in a “foreign” home which is off-reservation, is a visit I had years ago, as the guest of a farm family who lived on the border between North and South Dakota. We had a lovely time together though we were so different culturally and politically.

As is common with traditional stories, your story has a lesson. We watch Iktómi do something that is silly and learn from his mistake. This message is also a commentary on how indigenous people were forcefully removed from their homelands and how incredulous it is to “own the earth.” What are your thoughts on the ability of fictional stories to educate, heal, and work as a bridge between cultures? 

Entering fictional words as a reader develops our empathy “muscle.” I remember as a child delighting in the chance to walk in others’ footsteps, fascinated by the experiences of Francie Nolan in A Tree Grows in Brooklyn, or Anne’s adventures on Prince Edward Island in the Anne of Green Gables series. I was enthralled by the tale of Taran, a young Assistant Pig Keeper in The Book of Three, and I so believed that Narnia was a real place, I knocked on the back walls of every closet I encountered when my family stayed in motels. I was ready to storm my way into another world! 

I distinctly remember the first time I read Jane Austen in middle school, being awed by how well I could identify with an author who lived in an era from the distant past. Austen wasn’t Native, she’d never set foot in Chicago or danced at a powwow, yet I felt kin to her in our mutual distaste for hypocrisy. These connections beyond time and space and culture are the first step to developing respect across chasms of difference.

For Volume 25, you were the contributing fiction editor. What was your experience like in this role? Were there any surprises, or anecdotes you could share? Do you have any suggestions for anyone taking on a similar editing role? 

I’ve never served as a contributing editor before, so I had a LOT to learn. I was too wedded to following the “rules” laid out in the job description and should have reached out sooner to the wonderful executive editor, Meghan Maloney-Vinz, when I had questions. I’ve always been shy, an introvert, someone who tried to figure things out on her own. But a literary journal is a collaborative effort, and I needed to take advantage of the guidance available to me much sooner in the process. 

A lovely surprise is that I’ve become friends with some of the writers whose work was accepted for publication—people who were complete strangers until we began emailing back and forth regarding revision. Ultimately the experience of working with Mubanga Kalimamukwento, a terrific assistant editor and talented writer, and the entire team of dedicated staff and fellow contributing editors, Kao Kalia Yang, and Ed Bok Lee, was deeply rewarding!

What stories or writers are you excited about in the upcoming Volume 25?

Truly, all of them! Each story is so wildly different from the other—stories from all over the globe and from different eras. I’m so grateful for the diversity of experiences and voices. I’m thrilled that I was given the chance to invite writers to contribute a story, and as a result one of my favorite authors, Ernestine Saankaláxt Hayes of the Tlingit Nation, produced a new piece for this forthcoming issue. It startles me to think that the powerful story, “Drowning in Shallow Water,” might not have been written if not for the invitation.

What projects are you working on now? 

I’m currently working through the copy-edits of my new novel, A Council of Dolls, which will be published in the summer of 2023 by Mariner/HarperCollins. Before this version of the manuscript, I was working on a new novel, The Year of Fury, narrated by a Dakota woman who has lived for nearly two-hundred years. She’s been given extra mojo that prolongs her life, though to the world she looks as she did when she was still a young mother. She burns through her powers of vengeance too quickly and must learn the purpose and design of her true mission. There are also two short stories that need finishing—one a horror story inspired by actual events.

MONA SUSAN POWER is an enrolled member of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, born in Chicago. She is the author of four books of fiction: The Grass Dancer (recipient of a PEN/Hemingway Award), Roofwalker, Sacred Wilderness, and the forthcoming novel, A Council of Dolls, to be published in Summer 2023 by Mariner/HarperCollins. Grants that have supported her writing include an Iowa Arts Fellowship, James Michener Fellowship, Radcliffe Bunting Institute Fellowship, Princeton Hodder Fellowship, USA Artists Fellowship, McKnight Fellowship, and Native Arts & Cultures Foundation Fellowship. She lives in Saint Paul, Minnesota.