In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Darryl Holmes

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Darryl Holmes

Your poem in Vol. 24 “The Persistence of Memory” uses Salvador Dalí’s 1931 surrealistic painting (of the same name). Can you speak to the inspiration behind this poem? How did it come to be? 

I went back to get my MFA late in life because I needed something to restore my faith in my ability to write. During one of our residencies, I was fortunate enough to be introduced to ekphrastic poetry. I guess I didn’t pay enough attention many decades ago as a young, African-American undergrad in Creative Writing when Keats’ “Ode on a Grecian Urn” was being discussed. In the workshop, prints of famous artists were spread throughout the room. I was drawn to a 19th century French-artist Edouard Manet’s painting; interestingly enough it was a painting of his more well-known contemporary, Claude Monet, and his family. Claude’s wife Camille is the focal point of Manet’s rendering, and something about her sitting in the center of the garden in the lush green grass, with her chin resting quietly on her fist and the bottom of her pearl-white dress spread out like a fan, really struck me. The painting is called “The Monet Family in Their Garden at Argenteuil”, and I began to write about it. Since then, I’ve begun to look at art a bit differently, not just for appreciation, but for inspiration as well. 

My heart sank when my son first sent me the photo. It seemed so surreal, him being in a prison cell, something I never expected but was waiting for as a father of three Black sons. In the poem I say “it took me moments to remember what day it was…”  In truth it took me months to shake the thought of him being there until the emergence of the poem began to take hold. His face like the melted watches emerged as a rich simile. The Dali connection felt so clear: the surreal experience of time melting for me; melting for my son; his life possibly melting away forever…and the title of the painting seemed so apropos for the poem. The memory of my son in a prison cell truly was persistent.      

Is there a medium of art that you particularly like? Does it work in tandem with your poetry? 

I hope I’m interpreting your question correctly in considering “medium” in the broader sense of the type of art as opposed to the artistic material. I love traditional Jazz, and the two branches of the visual arts I’m most drawn to are paintings and sculptures. With paintings I’ve grown to lean more towards African-inspired themes and abstracts, but anything I can get lost in or look at over the course of multiple viewings and still feel something mystical or see something unpredictable is what does it for me. It is why I love listening to the greats of Jazz. I seem to hear something I hadn’t heard before or think about something different each time I experience a particular composition. Also, many years ago at an African Street Festival in Brooklyn, NY, I  fell in love with Shona stone sculpture from Zimbabwe. The intricacy of the carvings, the juxtaposition of rough and polished stone in a singular piece, and the power of the medium’s density command an emotional experience.  

The question of whether my affinity for art works in tandem with the creation of my poetry is an intriguing one. More often I tend to work and read in silence, so thoughts and music are invited to come through without me being plugged in. I often feel that if I plug into enough inspiration and stay open to enough of the world when I’m not writing, I may find the gift of the inspiration when I am writing coming through.  For example, over a two-year period in an earlier time in my life, I listened to Charlie Parker’s music at some point of every day. I never missed a day, and yet I never actually wrote while I was listening to his music. It is impossible that it didn’t become a part of me. The same is true for the ekphrastic experience, but in this case I’ve actually experimented with it more directly to drive my creativity. Most recently it was a black and white photo of my grandfather on my father’s side. He died when my father was 13. My father is alive and just recently turned 100.            

Who are some artists or works of art that you admire, and why do you like them?

Charlie Parker, Miles Davis and John Coltrane are the musical headliners for me, but I’ve been captivated by so many of the great established and aspiring artists I’ve come across over the years. Jazz forces me to think deeply. When I was introduced to Coltrane in my early twenties, I was initially intimidated by his music. It seemed too intellectually superior for me if that makes sense; but I hung in until I could hear him, and he opened up a space quite wondrous in me. I’ve always felt to some degree that I was born a few decades too late.  

When it comes to the visual arts, it would be disingenuous to say I’m familiar enough with many of the past and contemporary greats to have an informed and honest opinion of the works of art I admire. Interestingly enough, when I think about the ekphrastic connection, I was introduced to the experience of Monet’s famous Water Lilies paintings through a poem of the same name by the esteemed African-American poet, Robert Hayden. In my home, most of the original paintings that dominate our walls are from gifted artists I met at street festivals or local galleries. Leslie Floyd is one of my favorites.  He lives in the next town over from me in New Jersey. Not surprisingly, I’m particularly drawn to his musical pieces. When he’s at his best, the emotion he builds into the canvas comes out of the subject’s soul. I’m also fortunate to own a few pieces by the Jamaican painter, Paul Blackwood. His abstract art is quite jarring and colorful. I’m drawn to their work and artists like them because emotion in poetry is so important to me. I want the words of a poem to stay with me like the density of Shona stone. 

The element of fire is heavily portrayed in your poem, from Dalí’s melted clocks, to the melting of identity and lineage, to the blacksmithing techniques used to forge the metal bars of prison cells. There’s a deliberate use of imagistic craft at work here. What are your intentions with language and word choice while writing?

My intentions with language are to keep my word choices simple (for the most part) and to create a level of complexity through craft; either through the right choice and placement of individual words in a line; through the arrangement of lines in a stanza; or in the arrangement and sequence of the stanzas themselves. Imagery in a sense is everything for me. It drives my poetry’s emotional core when I’m successful. I grew up heavily digesting the atrocities that have been committed against Native-American and African-American people. Fire has often been used as a destructive force to control or erase our existence; from firearms used to kill and contain us when we were captured; to burnings following the savagery of lynching; to the leveling of black lives and property across the charred-span of 35 city-blocks in a place known at the time in Oklahoma as “Black Wall Street.” Yet we are still here and making our way cautiously. James Baldwin wrote The Fire Next Time. Richard Wright had Bigger Thomas put Mary in a furnace. I have vicariously become a part of a rich and painful experience, and I’ve come to realize that my poetry has no choice but to speak to this in some way or form. Sound remains important to me as well, so I find myself often working to balance the weight of assonance and alliteration in my work as I grapple with being the conduit for the right imagery. Lastly, I really appreciate your observation about the prison bars and how they play into the theme of fire. I wish I could say it was intentional on my part, because the prison cell was the impetus for the poem, but sometimes it simply comes down to having the patience not to force things.

Time is also a featured element here, though on the surface, it might be overlooked upon the first read. (I’m saying this because I actually didn’t notice it immediately!) But I love how each stanza has movement—past tense, present tense, a historical lens—which beautifully leans into Dalí’s distortion of space and time. I’m so curious how you envisioned the structure of your poem; can you talk a little about writing and revising until you locked each stanza in place?

Time is essential to the strength of the poem, particularly because of the placement of the third stanza.  We experimented a lot with disrupting our poems in grad school; playing a lot of what if scenarios. Sometimes scrambling things just to see if the change in arrangement elevated or detracted from the poem’s strength. I must say it was an uncomfortable experience in the beginning, but it really drove home the point that the process of revision is equally as important as the process of writing. Sometimes we are simply too close to our own work and others can often help us to see something we are missing. What I learned in my own growth in order to work more effectively outside of an academic setting or shared environment like a workshop is that a disruption process as a regular exercise can actually serve to free a writer up. Nothing becomes sacred until it truly feels right.  

I have to extend my sincere appreciation and give all of the credit to contributing editor Sean Hill and the editorial staff for seeing a greater possibility in this poem than what the original arrangement I submitted was achieving. I know how rare it is for a writer to receive a note from the editor with an offer to rearrange and resubmit a single poem for consideration when there are already an overwhelming number of submissions for a literary journal under review. I am grateful for the opportunity Water-Stone Review gave me: a one week extension to re-work and re-submit the poem with the ultimate goal of strengthening its tension by staying in the past even after the tension is apparently broken. I began to disrupt the poem even further, and found out that the movement of the second stanza into the third position was the prize that I was looking for; provided I could find the right language to replace what now was missing. Fortunately, I pulled it off.  Even after the son’s reveal with “his spool of emojis” in his follow-up text, the father in the third stanza is still in the past struggling to regain his footing.

I feel like writers, particularly in poetry and nonfiction, are always grappling with the issues of memory—its accuracy, its nonlinearity, its literary representation. One of the reasons I love your poem is the satisfaction from the surprises memories and images deliver to the reader. What are some ways you mine your memory for truth, for inspiration, for clarity?

You raise an interesting question here. I’m not sure if I have a good answer because I’m not sure if it’s a conscious process for me. Where does memory stop and imagination begin? Perhaps that is part of the struggle, like grappling with the accuracy of a poem when its emotional core feels abundantly clear. Yet, I do believe that starting from a point of truth is crucial. I could not write about lemons authentically if I never tasted them, even if I had memories of a lemon tree growing up in my backyard. I have to be emotionally invested. I have to hear the voices calling; connecting me to a spark, whether it’s from my personal experiences or from owning the responsibility of being an honest caretaker of someone else’s memories. In the case of this poem, it emerged from the truth that Black parents live with every day, especially as it relates to our sons. We have persistent feelings about something going wrong because of the myriad of tragedies locked in our memories. A sense of buckling becomes a part of our daily breathing… I’m glad you brought up the point of nonlinearity. I’m a movie junkie, and I’m also vulnerable to the appeal of a good streaming series. I guess you can call it one of my vices in life. I’m fascinated by script writers who effectively move forward and backwards and backwards and forward across time to create a level of intrigue and tension in a story. Ironically, I tend to be too linear in my approach to writing, so it’s important that I remind myself to step back and experiment after I think a particular piece is done. The story of how this poem came to be accepted for this issue of Water-Stone Review is a wonderful reminder of that for me!        

The title of Vol. 24, “Ghost(s) Still Living” comes out of a line from a poem included by Heather A. Warren. Given all that’s occurred in our world in the past year or two, what does the idea of “ghosts still living” mean to you?

I should start by saying I love the space and rhythm in Heather’s poem; the musicality and mystery they weave, so it was not surprising for me to learn they are also a percussionist. 

I guess the simple answer to your question is that I feel I owe everything to my parents and our ancestors who came before us, so the ghosts I most want to embrace are healing. My mom transitioned several years ago at the age of 90, but she still comes back to visit my father and younger sister. I’ve been working on a poem for her that I have yet to finish. It opens with the following lines: When my mother surrendered to a stroke at 90/we buried her stillness/still she comes to visit my sister at night/sometimes to lay a hand beneath my father’s hair/it is soft and light, lifting to her touch like smoke… Often in my moments of deep reflection I find myself connecting to a song by Gil Scott Heron and Brian Jackson called 95 South.” It’s from an album entitled Bridges, and the song is both a tribute to those who came before us and a promise that we owe it to them to carry on. However, I do understand the other side, and the truth is we all have scars, and the events of the past few years have only served to exacerbate them.  Sometimes they manifest as “ghosts(s) still living” that grip and inform our writing. Or, as Heather poignantly suggests by the title of their poem, they are “What Wounds Become.”

What projects are you working on now?

I honestly don’t have a regular writing process right now.  I have every intention of getting back to one when I retire in the next year from the rigor of corporate life. I envision devoting time to my writing daily once I’m there. For now, I continue to read enough to keep ideas flowing for my writing, and I often use my journal and iPhone recorder to capture the sparks that could turn into something special. I’m also working on additional revisions to a manuscript of poetry entitled Reasons For Water, and I continue to look for opportunities to submit individual work to literary publications from time to time like Water-Stone Review.    

Darryl Holmes received his MFA from Fairleigh Dickinson University, where he also served as an editorial reader for the university’s international journal of contemporary writing, The Literary Review. He has new work out or forthcoming in African American Review, Jelly Bucket, Kind Writers, the New York Quarterly, Obsidian, and Toho Journal. His first collection of poetry, Wings Will Not Be Broken, was published by Third World Press. 

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Jeannine Hall Gailey

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Jeannine Hall Gailey

Your poem “On the Autumn Equinox, 2019” from Volume 24 explores some big ideas on resistance: resistance from rape culture and patriarchy, resistance from predators or the changing of seasons, the body resisting it’s own state of health. Can you tell us how this poem came to you? What inspired you to write it?

At the time of writing that, I think we were going though the Kavanaugh hearings, and I had just been in the hospital with something MS-related. Before the pandemic, during the Trump presidency, it just seemed to be going from bad to worse – and I had no idea what would be coming. The birch trees in my yard were dying of a contagious disease, and it was hard not to feel it was a metaphor for my own life. 

You mention Margaret Atwood in “On the Autumn Equinox, 2019” and even without her inclusion by name, there’s a very Atwood-esque world built in your poem. It’s quasi-dystopian and female-centric, and I felt a sense of power from the bodies that appear in your poem because of this idea that we have to be prepared for the worst. What does power from bodily agency mean to you?

I can’t remember where I read that Atwood quote, if it was an interview or something, about always keeping cash on hand in case credit cards were suddenly unavailable. My grandmother used to send us these paperbacks called The Foxfire Books, which I found fascinating as a kid, all about how to plant crops and skin a pig or deer and rudimentary health care – all about survival. In a way, the other things I was fascinated with as a kid – fairy tales and mythology – were also essentially about survival. It’s a pretty abiding theme in all my books, from all kinds of angles – you will encounter danger, from outside, even inside your own body – and you will have to fight to survive. 

While reading through some of your past work, I came across your poem “The Husband Tries to Write to the Disappearing Wife”. I sense an overlap of ideas from that poem to “On the Autumn Equinox, 2019”. How do you envision these heroes, these agents of resistance and change that continue to surface in your writing?

I’m glad you found that poem, which is in my second poetry book, She Returns to the Floating World. Many of the Japanese folk stories have a theme of the “disappearing/transforming wife” – the crane wife, the fox wife – and I identified with those characters, the same as I identified with Ovid’s female characters in The Metamorphoses. The idea of transformation that keeps a woman from being an ideal wife/mother character – or that helps them to escape a dangerous situation – is a fascinating one. 

So much of your past work includes a lot of traditionally fictitious elements, like world building, folklore and fairy tales, mythology. What is it about speculative fiction that pulls you to it? What is it about poetry that allows you to marry these two genres?

I’ve always thought speculative work – fairy tales, mythology, science fiction – allows more space for “outsiders” than most traditional fiction. Monsters, mutants, rebels…Obviously I identified with the outliers in science fiction and comics more than the women presented in the majority of the literary fiction I had encountered as a young person. Outsiders, supervillains, weirdos, witches, women that turned into dragons – these were my literary touchstones. 

Who are some speculative fiction writers that you admire?

I love Margaret Atwood, Kelly Link, Haruki Murakami, Yoko Ogawa, Osamu Dazai. Aoko Matsuda is a new discovery I absolutely adore. I highly recommend her book Where the Wild Ladies Are – feminist, comic retellings of traditional Japanese ghost stories. A.S. Byatt’s Possession may not be what people consider “speculative” but it made me fall down the rabbit whole of studying the fairy Melusine mythology. 

You have two forthcoming books: Fireproof, due out in 2022 from Alternating Current Press, and Flare, Corona, due out in 2023 from BOA Editions. Congratulations on both! What can you tell us about each book?

Flare, Corona was started first; I actually started writing the manuscript in 2018 when I was diagnosed with terminal liver cancer after a random ER visit for stomach flu. That night there was a Blood moon eclipse, and a coyote ran across the car’s path on the way to the hospital. Later, after 2nd and 3rd opinions, I had my first round of chemo and had seen a grief counselor – it was decided by a different group of specialists that perhaps the liver tumors might be benign. A few months later I woke up and vomited every day for three months. I rapidly lost the ability to use my left arm and leg, to talk, to stand without drastic vertigo, and had to be hospitalized and then have intense physical, vertigo, and speech therapy. After multiple doctor visits, MRIs, blood work, I was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, which was a breathtakingly bad diagnosis, except for the fact that I was looking at it in comparison with a diagnosis of terminal cancer. As soon as my MS started to get somewhat stable, the pandemic was starting. An MS event like mine is called a “flare,” and around a solar flare, there is a “corona” of light. Hence, the title. 

So, I know it sounds like a lot of serious topics, but there are also supervillains, fairy tales, film noir tropes, and a sense of humor that (I hope) makes the book fun to read. I also hope it helps familiarize people more with multiple sclerosis – a fairly common but widely misunderstood disease.

Fireproof started as an idea or image – the idea of Joan of Arc and the witches of Salem being burned at the stake, and their offspring developing a genetic resistance to fire. This was written mostly during the Trump administration, when a weeping-about-beer rapist was appointed to the Supreme Court, and it felt like toxic misogyny, racism, and ableism were being celebrated in our country. Trump repeatedly referred to himself as being persecuted in a “witch hunt”, which I wanted to write more about, since the meaning of that phrase – how women throughout history were literally hung, drowned, tortured and burned for such things as reading and growing an herb garden, or leading armies successfully – and how the term had been mitigated in the public discourse, or even deranged.  

You mention in a blog post on your website that Flare, Corona will be your seventh book and it will be published right around the time you turn 50. You have years of experience in publishing, both on the editorial and writing side. What advice would you give to writers on career longevity?

The first is: Don’t give up! There were so many times that I thought I’d never make it this far, and I almost gave up writing to go back to a “regular” job. Even at the beginning of last year, I was feeling so discouraged I considered quitting poetry. I had a number of surprising and encouraging acceptances at journals I’d been trying to get into for a long time – including Water~Stone Review – and then the two book acceptances. 

And the second thing: be kind. Be kind to everyone you meet and work with. There is no way that being kind in the poetry world can hurt you, but being unkind definitely can. And make friends with other writers – their support and encouragement has been so invaluable to me over the years, and I’m not sure I would have stuck with it if I hadn’t made friends with writers who I’d seen succeed, and I’d seen persevere through their own hard times. 

With two books forthcoming, what projects are you working on now? 

I have a gigantic collection of pandemic poems – because for a lot of the pandemic, because I’m immune-compromised, I was very isolated and had a lot of time on my hands to read – and, yes, to write. I’d estimate I’ve written 200 poems in the last two years. I don’t have any idea yet how to shape them into a coherent collection, but that’ll probably be the work that will turn into my next book.

 

 Jeannine Hall Gailey served as the second poet laureate of Redmond, Washington. She’s the author of five books of poetry—Becoming the Villainess, She Returns to the Floating World, Unexplained Fevers, The Robot Scientist’s Daughter, and Field Guide to the End of the World—and winner of the Moon City Press Book Prize and the Science Fiction Poetry Association’s Elgin Award. Her work has appeared in journals such as The American Poetry Review, Ploughshares, and POETRY. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram: @webbish6 and learn more about her work at her website.

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Arleta Little

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—Arleta Little

Back in November 2020, we asked contributing creative nonfiction editor Carolyn Holbrook what types of submissions she wanted to receive for our forthcoming issue. “I can’t imagine Vol. 24 not having a lot to do with 2020,” she responded. “I want people to face 2020 head on. Obviously they need to be literary, but it’s important to me that submissions be very personal too, be it memoir or essays. I want to know what happened to you on May 25th. Where were you, what were you doing when you first heard about or saw that video about George Floyd? I’m hoping there are a fair number of people who are willing to really go there.” 

The following interview was conducted between contributor Arleta Little and assistant creative nonfiction editor Zoey Gulden discussing Arleta’s essay Life and Death in the North Star State” from Volume 24.

 

The first time I read your essay “Life and Death in the North Star State”, you gave it to Carolyn and me in an early draft. I knew then it would be the anchor for our nonfiction in that volume, but I also read the draftness of it, if you will. Can you talk about how this piece came together, the different stages of it? Did any version of this exist before the murder of George Floyd, and how did the spring of 2020 ultimately influence it?

I have tremendous gratitude for the editorial intuition and skillfulness that both you and Carolyn exercised in shepherding this piece, Zoey. It’s true, after I’d set down the initial narrative, this essay grew and developed in relationship with a village of caretakers.  I began almost immediately attempting to transcribe my experiences at protest, marches, and in the streets of Minneapolis following the murder of George Floyd. I had written an earlier essay specifically about an experience in George Floyd Square in June of 2020. I wrote “Life and Death” in March of 2021, approaching the one-year anniversary of the murder. By then, I was also exploring the chain reaction of trauma in my own body in an effort at healing.  My habit as a poet is to condense an array of impressions into precise language with as few words as needed. Carolyn really encouraged me in the first round of edits to open the piece up and to offer more detail. I shared this essay with my Black women’s writing group. They likewise had questions and wanted more, especially related to my personal narrative in the piece. I’d also done some prior writing and speaking about my grandparents’ participation in the Great Migration but for the first time in this piece, I linked my own journey north to make the piece resonant across generations. 

Place is very central to this essay. How do you find Minneapolis fitting in your creative process?

When I moved to Minneapolis, I was ready to put down roots. Indeed, this is the first placed that I’ve lived where I can point in the direction that the sun comes up; or where I’ve learned the history of the land from the perspective of the Indigenous peoples who have stewarded it for ten thousand years; or where I’ve learned the family stories of the people with whom I’ve built community over time. I’ve worked with supporting artists here and I became an artist here. These cumulative relationships and lived experiences make a place a home and have made Minneapolis my home. When I sat down to write “Life and Death”, I was wrestling with some of the deep contradictions of this place, puzzling with questions provoked not just by my visceral responses to successive police killings of Black people in the Twin Cities, but I was also wrestling with the chronic statistical disparities in the quality of life for African Americans in this state. I needed to explore not only what brought me to Minneapolis but also what was keeping me here. Staying proximate with the deep contradictions that exist in this place was tough and fruitful creative work.  

I’m thinking specifically about the graveyard prose page. Early versions of the piece listed the names and death dates more like prose, but on the editorial table I envisioned something a little different. How did that editorial feedback coincide with your revision process?

Once I’d completed a draft, I felt confident in the bones of the story. The sinew of themes and the imagery were also there. With this foundation in place, I was open to dialogue in service of making the piece better. It also helped that Carolyn and I had worked together on writing projects in the past. Over many years, we have established trust and mutual respect that buttressed the editorial process. In receiving feedback on this piece, I regularly referred to the African saying that it takes a village to raise a child. So, too, a creative project! That’s how I approached the feedback from the women in my writing group and likewise, with you and Carolyn as editors for the piece in Water~Stone.  For example, when you suggested that we visually represent the names of the murdered stacked across the page, echoing the form of the gravestones at the Say Their Name Memorial, I thought – VILLAGE! I was open and eager to see how it would look. The result went beyond my singular vision and was spectacular!

I consider this piece ekphrastic in its nature, describing both art around George Floyd Square and the artfulness of Minneapolis itself. I’m especially moved by the line “The depression in the land cupped both the weight of the cemetery and my heart.” In what ways was Say Their Names influential as an art installation near the memorial site? What is it like for you to write about art?

This is what art and artists do! They help us to make meaning of our lives and experiences. Beyond this, they connect us with the lives and experiences of other human beings and the planet. The Say Their Names memorial is so realistic. It is hard not to believe that there weren’t bodies under the ground. For anyone who has been to or seen a military cemetery, the installation really evoked the same solemn, iterative grief. But beyond the object of the installation itself, the real power was in knowing that there was a life and a story that went with each of those 100 markers, just like the story of George Floyd’s life and death that we are still living in Minneapolis. For me, after being present and bearing witness … my writing was an offering that I could make. Just like the people who brought flowers, played music, left paintings, offered books or prayer or massage, left shoes, handed out water or hand sanitizer, or circulated petitions … like whatever folks offered in illustration of community at and around George Floyd Square, writing was something I could offer to honor both the dead and the living.        

What led to the decision to publish this with a literary annual like WSR? Did you find this a good home for the piece, or did the piece need this to be its home? 

Honestly, I knew Carolyn better than I knew Water~Stone when I submitted this essay, so this is a testament to the communities that different editors have access to and can bring along with them into literary spaces like WSR. Now, with the book in hand, I love seeing my essay in with a mix of forms, a diversity of voices, and images all connected with a thematic through line, exquisitely curated as both a feast for the imagination and a document of communal discourse.          

Meditation and mindfulness are a strong thread in this essay. How does your practice influence your art? Do you have any guidance for artists trying to infuse meditation with their lives?

My creativity and spirituality are rooted in presence, practicing being present with what is unfolding in the moment whether in a sit or on a page. The ability to focus and to be present gets better with practice so the most important thing is to keep showing up to the practice. Studying and having a community with which to practice also helps a lot!     

We titled Volume 24 “Ghost(s) Still Living,” from a line in a poem by Heather A. Warren, as a way to honor the ghosts still alive inside of us, or perhaps, in honor of us—the ghosts who go on living. What does this mean to you, in relation to the pandemic and the murder of George Floyd? How do you understand this title to reflect through your particular piece?

Heather’s poem is so powerful especially because we go on living in the midst of both pandemics, COVID and racism. Both of them disrupt the distinct boundaries of time and space that separate us from our ancestors and progeny. Many of us know people who are now ancestors because of COVID. And yet, they live on inside of us, in our memories and in the stories we share with the next generation. Similarly, we know our history of white supremacy, and yet, it lives on in our daily lives threatening our dreams and hopes for peace and democracy. And too, there’s living on this planet in this moment when we know that our actions here and now could extinguish the viability of future life on Earth. So many ghosts. And yet, we cannot succumb to fear and alienation. Here’s where a bell can bring us back. As I write near the end of my essay, “Then I took a seat on a blanket and struck a Tibetan bowl.  The sound of the bell echoed over the field and I felt myself centering down, connecting to the ground beneath me.  My mind slowed its running.  Time and distance, life and death, ancestors and progeny converged in the here and now of each breath.” Now, how can we show up as the change that we most need?  

What projects are you working on now?

Happily, I have several projects in process.I am assembling a collection of poems. I have a collaborative project in the works with visual artist Ta-coumba Aiken that will pair his paintings with my writings. I am also working on a book of meditations inspired by the 20th century African American contemplative mystic, Howard Thurman.  

Arleta Little is a writer and culture worker, and the executive director of the Loft Literary Center. Her literary work has appeared in Blues Vision: African American Writing from Minnesota and in Saint Paul Almanac. She is a co-author along with Josie R. Johnson and Carolyn Holbrook of Hope in the Struggle: A Memoir about the life of Josie R. Johnson. She has worked as the executive director of the Givens Foundation of African American Literature and as an arts program officer and the director of artist fellowships at the McKnight Foundation. She lives in the Longfellow neighborhood in Minneapolis, Minnesota..

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—David Aloi

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors—David Aloi

People Here”, your story in Vol. 24, immediately transported me to my middle-school days crowded around a friend’s computer, the sweet sound of the dial-up connection whirring, hoping we could find some harmless fun in a chat room, much like a teenaged Anthony seeks in The Bonfire. Tell us about the inspiration for this story. 

It was truly a unique time to be a kid, right around when the internet was taking off. And no one really had any idea of its power. There’s a scene from Seinfeld when someone is explaining to Jerry how this new thing called “email” works and he says, amazed, “What are you a scientist?!” That’s kind of how everyone felt, that it was something from another world, beyond our comprehension. 

When it came to chat rooms, this idea of talking to someone you didn’t know was thrilling for me. I didn’t have the best time in school growing up so there was this clean slate feeling of the internet. I could sign on to AOL with a fresh start. I can still close my eyes and see the chats piling on top of each other in these rooms: a/s/l, a/s/l, a/s/l. It was like a new language. And I wanted in. I was learning about the internet at the same time I was learning about myself. And I think that’s where the story came from. 

Below the surface-level humor suffused throughout the story, there’s a real sad truth to Anthony’s life experiences. He’s very alienated from his peers and his mother, so his source for human interaction comes from anonymous people he meets on the Internet. Without giving away the ending for those who haven’t read it yet, can you give us some context to your plot decisions whether to make this story veer into very dark territory or something safer for Anthony? 

This story was always going to be dark. I think it’s a good example of my style as a writer. I hope to be light, funny, charming, kind of la-di-da, then boom. There’s this “game” Anthony and Todd play, and when I recalled it from my actual childhood (which is crazy to think we played it), I knew it had to factor immediately into this story. Also, I knew I wanted the reader to feel more aware of what was going on than our main character. Almost like watching a scary movie and you’re yelling at the screen, “No, don’t go in there!” 

In that same vein, are there parallels that you notice between Anthony’s experience to our very real existence now when so much of our lives are online? How might this story be different for Anthony had you set it in 2021?

That’s an interesting question. I initially thought ‘Oh, well Anthony probably would use Grindr and meet people’ but I think actually any social media app would give him access to strangers. If the story took place today, I think the majority of it would stay the same, but maybe the speed at which things would happen would be quicker. In terms of the technology, there would be no learning on Anthony’s part. It would be innate. Oh, and the moms wouldn’t be mall walking because what is a mall? I suppose they could speed walk through an Amazon Fresh store but that would be weird!   

“People Here” is the chat room function noting the count of people in The Bonfire. What made you make this the title of the story? It poses so many possible interpretations for different readers. What does it mean to you?

The original name of the story was actually “The Bonfire.” But I felt it didn’t quite capture the feeling I was going for. And you’re right, “People Here” indicates the count but also lists all the screen names of people in the chat room. And they were never real names, it was always something made up that may or may not have something to do with the human who was behind it. Yet that became your identity in this new world. It’s something so common now—screen names, usernames, handles, etc.—but back then, it was novel. I remember looking at the list of strange names in chat rooms and thinking ‘Who are all these people?’ And I think that captures the feeling of the story much better. 

Switching gears, you have this lovely essay from INTO dedicated to Robyn, and an essay from Cuepoint about Mazzy Star. You write quite a bit from this purview of teenage-ness, often tinged with nostalgia and perhaps a little kindness for the younger self (which I love, by the way!). Where does the well of content come from for you? How influential is pop culture to you for writing ideas?

It was nice of you to read all that old-ish stuff. As I mentioned before, I had a tough time in elementary and high school and I think when we go through hard times, we are forever attempting to process it. For me, writing about those times is cathartic, or it must be, right? Like I’m trying to figure something out or maybe, get something out of me. So I can move on. As for pop culture, I’m still super into it. I grew up consuming music, books, TV, and movies. It’s a huge part of my identity today. I applied to NYU because I heard them sing about it in RENT (I didn’t get in). I realized that gay people were actually happy and danced at a club called Babylon from Queer as Folk. I discovered a big part of my authentic young self through Ani Di Franco’s early music. Other people’s art showed me and continues to show me a bigger world beyond myself. 

Since you’ve written a lot about music, I have to know: does music factor into your creative process as a writer? 

For sure! I think music was my first introduction to art to tell you the truth. I remember when I was rejected by a girl (via folded note) in sixth grade. I ran off the bus, into my room, and wept to Des’ree’s “Kissing You” from the Romeo + Juliet soundtrack. And just kept reading the note and repeating the song. Little did I know I was participating in art, commiserating with it, and expressing myself. Since then, I’ve just been a mess with music. I make all sorts of playlists for myself and my friends. I think I just love feeling intense feelings and get that so much through music. Still to this day. It inspires me to create and see if I can give back in some way. 

If you could only ever read three books again in your lifetime, what would they be, and why?

The Perks of Being a Wallflower because it was a revelation for me in high school with gayness, with music, with darkness; A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius because it made me move to San Francisco after college and be a writer; and Interpreter of Maladies because of its beauty and patience and masterful lessons in short fiction. 

You’re working on your debut collection. Can you tell us more about it? What other projects are you working on right now?

Sure, it’s a collection of around fifteen stories that all feature protagonists who are gay, but none of the characters meet their big tragedies because they are gay, if that makes sense. I’m at the homestretch with it now: writing the last two stories, editing, sending a couple more out to magazines. Also I’ve heard publishers want novels so I have that going as well. There’s this whole business side of writing that’s new to me. I don’t have an agent yet so I’m kind of just figuring out what I need to do and doing it. Just learning as I go.

David Aloi is a writer living in Los Angeles. He received his MFA in fiction from California College of the Arts and has worked at Grindr, Medium, and McSweeney’s. His writing has appeared in The New York Times Magazine, Chicago Review, CutBank, The Rumpus, and Flaunt, and is forthcoming in Joyland. He has been awarded fellowships from MacDowell, Lambda Literary, and Martha’s Vineyard Institute of Creative Writing. Currently, he’s finishing what will be his debut collection. You can learn more about David and his work at his website, and follow him on Instagram and Twitter

Inside and Outside the Box by Stan Sanvel Rubin

Inside and Outside the Box by Stan Sanvel Rubin

For the past two years, our poetry reviews editor Stan Sanvel Rubin has wondered what impact pandemic-related isolation and online reading events will have on the future of writing. Like many of us, Stan found comfort and community from attending virtual events, but these events also created new expectations placed on the shoulders of readers and viewers. As we prepare for a second annual reading with a virtual component on December 3, this time under the lens of what haunts us, we invite you to read this essay Stan wrote for us, and to reflect on another year of resilience and grace.

Now that the long crisis is hopefully fading into the “good riddance” category, it’s worth thinking about what we’ve been through and where it leaves literature. Certainly, we will continue to want to connect our work to the world, to seek response and validation, but the way we do that might have changed more than we know.

During the pandemic, I experienced the three key positions (other than tech) in the “Zoom” system: reader, host, audience. It was eye-opening to realize how each differs from similar roles in the world misnamed “normal.” To start with the obvious, the venue is different. Audience is transformed into a composite of separate boxes, replacing a physical collective. “Presence” at such events depends first on audio and video systems whose functioning is subject to the vagaries of electronic connection. If you do make it “there,” it can be an oddly isolating place compared to the energy of an in-room, live group response. (Think how one laugh in a movie theater can be contagious.) Your “place” is not established in a real space, but in your box–and out of it at the same time.

Never has the line between inside and outside this box been more sharply delineated for most Americans. This fits literature. What is a poem, a story, or an essay, after all, but an attempt to draw meaning from a personal “inside” and to bring it, in the shaped way we call art, to an audience “outside?” Literature begins with the interior sounding of words. By shaping and uttering them, the writer hopes to make a “value-added” contribution beyond the commonplace miracle of speech. The field to do so now has suddenly expanded.

That the “two-way screen” is changing the familiar was illustrated to me by a June 2020 announcement from Rattle that their weekly “Rattlecast” will include: a live “Poets Respond” segment before the reading, prompts for poems to be read after it, “or anything else the audience would like to share.” These interactive events are livestreamed on major social media platforms and recorded for posterity on various podcasting apps. Rattle does state a notable caution: “Remember that these poems will be broadcast and archived in audio and video form. We don’t believe this should count as “publication” for literary purposes, but other magazines might.”

New digital platforms appeared almost immediately. Entropy added the category “Virtual Readings” to its valuable “Where to Submit” list. The pandemic has also posed a special challenge for arts organizations. Events that need planning well in advance have been particularly at risk. Residencies, workshops, conferences, and festivals went virtual. There were also strategies for literature to reach “outside” with new forms of community, for instance The Academy of American Poets’ ambitious “Shelter in Poems” virtual reading project.

Whatever is underway, it has to do with the economy of literature in the broadest sense, the function of the poem, story, or essay in the exchange between writer and audience. Just as radio did long ago, “Zoom” and its peers have shifted the scale of communication in the direction of an inclusive, limitless horizon rather than the “closed loop” of limited seating and access. This change is one of locality, or scope of participants included, which differs from any specific location. The presumed common point is “the screen,” but it’s pretty mind-blowing to consider the expansive geography behind this virtual meeting place.

Thanks to this new inclusiveness, I was able, while at home, to be present at regular episodes of an international poetry gathering, enjoy national readings whose viewers and presenters were in many states, and, through the good offices of our local public library, remain active in (and occasionally host) the monthly poetry group I have participated in for several years. The latter specializes in sharing poems by other poets, well known or not. It is individual and celebratory, a good way to keep poems alive person-to-person. When we finally got together again, in a circle in the founder’s garden, we were obviously glad to see and hear familiar, fully present humans. The setting was alive with the flowers and sounds of spring. We saw each other’s faces and living gestures. One word for this is proximity. It’s what “poetry of place” draws on. An imperfect comparison might be seeing through the longer end of the telescope versus the shorter end. Distance offered revelation, scope and a sense of adventure, while the near offered relief, a return to the familiar, the intimacy of shared space.

Has everything changed? A cautionary note was provided in widely circulated comments of poet-professor-editor Gerald Costanzo on the occasion of his retirement:

“Poetry can do many things. But I’m not sure it can account for or articulate adequately what has happened to us. And you will be disappointed by the limits of human communication — especially as these apply to the ones you love. But you will know because you have experienced some of the worst that can happen to us.”

Is it possible that an extended experience of literature on screen at a distance can transform not only a writer’s relationship to audience, but our relationship to the writing? During this time, the writer who wanted to participate as a reader had to become a performer as much as a composer of words, regardless of prior inclination. The gap between spoken literature and written literature, originally initiated by the printing press, has been further breached. Now it’s “back to the future,” due to the effective removal of the page from the center of the process.

Despite Romantic and universalist aspirations, the “value” of writing always has been more or less specific to a given culture. In ours, the printed work derived its value from an economy of scarcity: the editorial scrutiny of many, and the selection of a few, followed by the delayed gratification of publication. The value of publication was in turn determined by some ranking of “prestigious” or “quality” or at least recognizable journals. In academia, a list like that can still be exchanged for tangible reward. Recognition for the sake of reputation can be had now in both worlds: for example, Pushcart Prize and “Best of the Net” nominations. The fracturing of a university–based hierarchy has been in process for many years for many reasons, not least the American impulse toward equality and inclusion, and the flourishing of performance-based and digital work as their own genres.

Our new reliance on technology has accentuated the amorphous status of “publication,” including the meaning of the word. Reading one’s writing on screen to a geographically diverse audience puts the writer not just “on display,” but literally face to face and “word-to-word” with distant peers, some with achievements and reputations of their own. Is it a stretch to suggest that having your work appreciated in such a setting may offer a form of validation approximating a journal acceptance? Attaining the “finality” of print no longer carries an aura of secular sanctification. Nor is it, if it ever was, Emily Dickinson’s “auction of the soul.”

Despite glitches, the immediacy and fluidity of an on-screen reading is actually closer to the temporal flow we live in and create from than is a “stage” or auditorium presentation. Some of the events I participated in were followed not only with the familiar question and answer period, but also spontaneous conversation among whomever stayed logged in long enough, including the featured writers. Some offered “open mic” time as well. Given the ability to come and go as needed, the difference from a physically present experience becomes as significant as the similarity. If “the medium is the message,” the message has altered. It reaches to the “quiet” writer, the one not looking for audience beyond the page. The fact that comparatively few print or online magazines reach a truly broad audience, despite how much creative work is being written, suggests that the “new” screen promises further transformation. The onscreen poem, story, or essay can live many lives.

In the decades when writing was centered on the university, “permanence” was conferred by inclusion in key anthologies and being on the list of so-called major publishers. The rapid proliferation of screen poetry in particular has worked, like the explosion of small presses, to undermine old hierarchies. Impermanence is the new mode. Audiences for these readings can be as unpredictable as the events themselves; a few seemed to occur in almost “flash mob” fashion, with little notice and accommodating last minute sign-in. All could be recorded for easy link access later, another similarity-with-difference from the traditional archive where recordings, if available, are accessed via bureaucratic procedures, often at a fee.

Events I attended were free, or at a nominal contribution to a sponsoring independent bookstore, non-endowed literary program, or advocacy organization. The fact that such readings create possibilities for outreach to everywhere and, at the same time, can provide a stream of small (but theoretically unlimited) revenue is one reason “distance” readings won’t disappear from the scene. Well-established organizations that have “Zoom’d” only out of necessity will have decisions to make about their future.

So has the game really changed? Wait and see. But the outlook for literature is far brighter than it seemed at the start of the crisis two years ago. Adaptability having been proven yet again. Writing is still alive and well.

Stan Sanvel Rubin, a former director of the SUNY Brockport Writers Forum and Video Library, retired in 2014 after a decade as co-founding director of the Rainier Writing Workshop Low-Residency MFA program. His fourth full collection, There. Here., was published by Lost Horse Press; his third, Hidden Sequel, won the Barrow Street Poetry Book Prize. His poems have appeared widely in magazines including The Georgia Review, AGNI, Poetry Northwest, Kenyon Review, The Florida Review, The Shanghai Literary Review, and others, plus two recent anthologies: the 25th Anniversary Issue of Atlanta Review, and Nautilus Book Award winner For Love of Orcas. He received the 2018 Vi Gale Award from Hubbub. He lives on the North Olympic Peninsula of Washington.