A Peek Into Production, by Meghan Maloney-Vinz

A Peek Into Production, by Meghan Maloney-Vinz

A pile of word docs soon to become a journal.

With the last month of summer upon us, it seems like the right time to check into the production of Volume 22.  

Minneapolis College of Art and Design.

In May, after the editorial board and their faculty editors made their final selections, production began in earnest with an initial Design + Concept Meeting at MCAD’s DesignWorks. At the meeting, this year’s MCAD student design intern, Patrick Sexton (who had read a first draft of this year’s issue by then) presented the production team (executive editor, Mary Rockcastle, assistant managing editor, Robyn Earhart, DesignWorks studio manager, Dylan Cole, graphic designer Kayla Campbell, and myself) and with photography that he felt best corresponds with the recurring images and themes of the written work selected.

It is an exciting meeting as the marriage of image and language begins to take shape and we start to see the issue in its physical form. We envision the reading, the poster at the podium, and the bookshelf at AWP. The journal has a tangible future that fuels our collective momentum.

Before being handed off to MCAD for layout, the entire manuscript goes through several thorough editing rounds. First, and early round of direct editing between genre editors and contributors, and then again with our copy editor and proofreader, Anne Kelley Conklin.

After all of Anne’s requested changes are satisfied, the entire manuscript is finally handed over to Patrick and the DesignWorks team who work for two weeks on the layout for the first galley.

The galley, or proof is our first version of what will eventually become that beauty on the shelf. It is actually presented to us in paper form, so we can actually experience what the spreads look like, and how the layout of each specific piece works on the page template. Using our style guide, we compare the pieces to each other, but we also check each piece to the final version submitted. Sometimes small spacing issues or other quirks emerge or get lost in the translation of files, and it’s our job to find these inconsistencies and set them right.

We are currently at the review stage of Galley 1.

We will repeat the drill again in about three weeks, when we will receive the second galley. Hopefully, all of the requested changes have been made and if not, we repeat again until it is right. It is at this stage that we also make available to our contributors a PDF version of their piece as it is set to appear in the journal. It is our last line of approval before going to print in mid-late September.

And then we hold our breath. The work is done and the time to surface is near. The crisp white boxes appear at our door in early October, and with rapid heart rates and steady hands we slice open the tops.

The neat stacks of that magic, materialized. 

Author:

MEGHAN MALONEY-VINZ

MANAGING EDITOR

MEGHAN MALONEY-VINZ  has worked as managing editor for Water~Stone Review for over a decade now. Prior to coming on board with Water~Stone she worked as the design coordinator for Hamline Creative Writing graduate student literary magazine rock, paper, scissors (a journal she helped create). Aside from her work with Hamline Creative Writing, Maloney-Vinz is also a founding member and project manager for broadcraft press. and serves as managing editor for The UnderReview, a sports adjacent literary journal. Her spare time finds her at a local sporting event (big or small), driving her children to various activities, or day-drinking with other writerly types.

In the Field: Conversations With Our Contributors–Melissa Hite

In the Field: Conversations With Our Contributors–Melissa Hite

1. Tell us about your poem, “Landmannalaugar,” in Volume 21. How did it come to be?

When I was in college, I spent a week in Iceland as part of a study abroad program through my conservative Christian university. Our guides took us to this beautiful, remote hot spring up in the mountains—Landmannalaugar—and when we got there, the spring was filled with naked people, most of them elderly. We, of course, were not going to be naked in the hot spring. We were required to bring one-piece (not two-piece) swimsuits. But something about these peoples’ nudity struck me as so beautiful and pure, Edenic. I was jealous of their freedom to just exist in their bodies without shame.

 

2. What excites you as a writer? What turns you off, makes you turn away or stop reading a piece of writing?

In my (very limited) experience, life is so much weirder than I ever expect it to be. Emotions and situations are so much more complicated than most media has prepared me for. So when something captures an experience or a feeling that I’ve had, in all its bizarre complexity, I love that. It’s validating for me. And it takes so much skill to do well. In the same vein, if something rings false, it’s going to lose me (I can usually tell when a female character has been written by a man—I think most women can).

3. What books, writers, art, or artists inspire you and your work? Do–or have–you had any mentors in your writing life?

As a young writer, I’m very much still working on finding my own voice… so I find that my work often mimics whoever I’ve been reading most recently. I love Flannery O’Connor, John Steinbeck, Ann Patchett, Mary Oliver. I’m forever indebted to my high school creative writing teacher, Mr. Jacobson, who showed me that poetry didn’t have to be lame, and Dr. Engel, who taught my Writing Fiction class. 

4. Do you practice any other art forms? If so, do these influence your writing and/or creative process?

I’ve fallen in love with cooking over the last few months. For the longest time, I told myself I wasn’t a good cook—mainly because I’d never really tried. Discovering that I can cook has been a huge confidence builder. There’s something really fulfilling about making something beautiful that’s also literally sustaining, to me or to people I’m sharing with. I think any kind of creative endeavor like that helps keep your artistic juices flowing even if you’re having a fallow period with your primary art. I’m not always writing, but I’m always doing something to keep that muscle working.

5. What does your creative process look like? How does the environment you are in shape your work or where do you like to write?

Most times, it starts with an uncomfortably long period where I’m just staring at a blank screen, and I’m drained of every creative thought I’ve ever had, and I forget how to write sentences. But I’m told that’s fairly normal. If I can find even one sentence, that can usually open the floodgates. I’ve had to learn to just write a first draft without asking myself if it’s good or not, because if I wonder about that too much, I won’t write anything.

I find I need to move around a lot when I write, especially if I’m hitting a wall. I’ll bounce around from my dining room table to the coffee shop to the library and back. I just need a change of scenery every so often.

Melissa Hite is a writer living in Little Rock, AR. Her work has appeared in Equinox: Poetry and Prose, Relief: A Journal of Faith and Art, and SchoolCEO, among others. You can follow her work at her website https://www.melissakhite.com/.

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors–Jordan Escobar

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors–Jordan Escobar

1. Tell us about your poem in Volume 21, “Necropsy.” How did it come to be?

This poem came about from reminiscing about a class I took in undergrad. I got my bachelors in Animal Science and the coursework included taking a class called Equine Science. Part of the class involved performing a necropsy of a mare. It was such a visceral experience that I think it always stayed in my head. Years later when I got a job at the zoo, someone mentioned the word “necropsy” and the memories came flooding back. 

 

2. What excites you as a writer? What turns you off, makes you turn away or stop reading a piece of writing?

I’m interested in writing that employs innovative techniques that stretch language to its expressive limits. Poetry has an advantage in some ways in that it is iconographic—a lot can be done with the visual aspect of how text appears on the page. I’m less interested in excessively descriptive language or writing that employs overused vague clichés. 

3. What are some themes/topics that are important to your writing?

I often consider Philip Levine’s admonishment that poetry provides “a voice for the voiceless.” I try to highlight marginalized experiences that don’t often receive attention in current popular literature. For much of my life, I have worked blue-collar jobs in construction and agriculture. I try to relate those experiences and the experiences of the individuals I have met along the way. In doing so, I also try to reconcile humanity’s place in the natural world—how we relate to the animals around us, what impact we leave on the landscape and what impact it leaves on us. I’ve recently become enamored with the idea of “inherent geographies” whereby we carry with us constantly where we’ve been, the physical reality of how land has shaped us, and how we continue to change with it.

4. What books, writers, art, or artists inspire you and your work? Do–or have–you had any mentors in your writing life?

I try to live by the principle that in order to create good art you have to consume good art. Poets that inspire me are Larry Levis, Philip Levine, James Dickey, Atsuro Riley and Ocean Vuong, among others. I love the landscape paintings of Homer Winslow and photographs of Ansel Adams. I also find the music of French impressionist composers like Maurice Ravel, Claude Debussy, and Erik Satie to be particularly enlightening. My writing mentor is the poet Kevin Clark, who was my undergraduate professor, and has been a critical driving force in my continued desire to pursue writing.

5. What does your creative process look like? How does the environment you are in shape your work or where do you like to write?

For each piece of writing, the creative process looks different for me. I seldom write in the same place each time. Much of my idea generating comes from being out in the physical world, whether working or simply hiking about, and then refining those experiences. Some times this act of refining can occur in the moment, which is why I often carry notepads with me. I can recall several occasions working on a farm, shoveling or driving a tractor, and hurriedly scribbling down a line of a poem down before moving on. For me, writing is an active process and one moment can inspire another. The cold bite of a winter morning can recall an alpine summit, gulls in a parking lot can recall a coastal rendezvous, and the smell of a barn in New England can recall riding through vineyards back in California. 

Jordan Escobar is a writer, teacher, and zookeeper from Bakersfield, California. His work can be found in Blue Earth Review, Crosswinds Poetry Journal, Terrain, and elsewhere.

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors–Elaine Ford

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors–Elaine Ford

In a break from our normal protocol, we present this special In The Field featuring Elaine Ford. WSR published Ford’s piece “Briggate” posthumously, as submitted for consideration by her husband Arthur Boatin. In the following Q&A, Arthur has crafted answers on Elaine’s behalf, often gleaning from her previously published interviews and essays.

1. Tell us about Elaine’s fiction piece, “The Briggait,” in Volume 21. How did it come to be?

The fiction of Elaine’s final decade is mainly historical, based on the lives of real people. After her retirement from teaching in 2005, she threw herself into researching her Ford ancestors who, in the 19th century, lived in Alabama and Mississippi. Later she worked on my maternal line, the Mendelsons, who emigrated from Eastern Europe in the 1890s to Scotland, moving on later to America. In this research Elaine was not seeking material for fiction, but in time her fiction-writer instincts were activated by immersion in these bare-bones life histories. The eventual result was two book-length manuscripts: God’s Red Clay, a Ford family novel covering the years 1831 to 1880; and Bread and Freedom: Stories of an Immigrant Family’s Journey, whose scope in years is 1882 to 1933.

“The Briggait” is a Bread and Freedom story. Tillie Morgan, the protagonist, was my maternal great-grandmother. The real Tillie died in the 1930s, and Elaine could get little information from living sources about this woman’s character or demeanor. An existing studio photograph from the period may or may not show Tillie, but in her story, Elaine uses the dress worn by the portrait subject. From city and census records, ships’ manifests, and other historical documents, the writer knew Tillie’s place of birth and date and place of marriage, her occupation and addresses and cohabitants while living in Scotland, and the date and means of her travel to the United States.

Elaine’s self-imposed rule in writing historical fiction was never to depart from known fact. Why the characters do what they do, however, and how they feel about it: these she thought fair for imagining. In later Mendelson stories set in New York, Tillie plays a supporting role. For the character’s turn at center stage in “The Briggait,” Elaine zeros in on Tillie’s moment of decision: whether to abandon the life she has made in Glasgow and change countries yet again. Did the real Tillie struggle with this decision, as the character does? Vos iz deyn meynung? What do you think?

2. What excited her as a writer? What turned her off, made her turn away, or stop reading a piece of writing?

Elaine was attracted to fiction that vividly portrayed individual communities and cultures, especially small, tight communities (four of her five published novels fit this bill). She liked it when place and environment had significant presence in a story, shaping—for good or ill—the people of that place. She appreciated work that granted complex inner lives to outwardly unexceptional people. She valued precise writing that employed telling, rather than voluminous detail. Herself a careful observer and extensive researcher, she had little patience for anachronism in fiction and similar writerly sloppiness.

3. What are some themes/topics that were important to her writing?

Seemingly small decisions and events can produce profoundly significant results. Things rarely turn out as planned. We have less freedom than we imagine. Still, trying to choose and grow and overcome is the right course. “For me the whole point of writing is to tell it like it is, not like I wish it were.”

4. What books, writers, art, or artists inspired her and her work? Did she have any mentors in her writing life?

Elaine published her first novel at age forty-one, by which time she likely had digested any literary influences. In 1990, after the release of her fourth novel, she told an interviewer that “my style [of writing] has always been the same… I’m interested in doing the same things and have more or less the same way of telling the story as I did [in high school].” Nonetheless, Elaine readily acknowledged a youthful fascination with the novels of Thomas Hardy. Their underlying determinism may have helped shape her own worldview, or at least reinforced her independent conclusions about life and fate. Other favorite writers included Alice Munro, whose character-centered storytelling, and finding drama in the everyday, has much in common with Elaine’s own fiction. Elaine admired as well the short stories of Bernard Malamud and his novel The Assistant. Elizabeth Bream, a high school English teacher, encouraged her writing aspirations and remained a lifelong friend. In an autobiographical sketch on her website, Elaine credits an undergraduate creative writing course with the avant-garde novelist John Hawkes for having “taught me the values of significant detail and economy of language,” methods that she encouraged in her own students.

5. Are there other forthcoming pieces of Elaine’s work that we can look forward to reading?

At her death in 2017, Elaine left behind five book-length fiction manuscripts. One of these, This Time Might Be Different: Stories of Maine, was published posthumously in 2018 by Islandport Press. The story “Scare” from the Bread and Freedom manuscript was published in No. 94 of Crazyhorse in 2018. The story “Providence” from the Bread and Freedom manuscript appears in Volume 10 of the Westchester Review. Two new works by Elaine will be published in 2019. The story “Bearing Witness,” which is from the Bread and Freedom manuscript, will be published online at JewishFiction.net. A Civil Wartime chapter called “Under Cover” from the novel God’s Red Clay will come out in Arkansas Review

For more information on Elaine’s writing legacy, please visit her website at https://www.elainefordauthor.com/.

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors–Kelly Cressio-Moeller

In The Field: Conversations With Our Contributors–Kelly Cressio-Moeller

1. Tell us about your poem in Volume 21, “Panels from a Celestial Autumn.” How did it come to be?

It’s an invented form where each section or ‘panel’, as in a polyptych in painting is a separate voice but the sections hang together as part of a larger whole. I began this quartet of seasonal panels about 6 years ago with summer and this autumn panel was the last poem I wrote for the sequence and the last poem I wrote for my first full-length collection (currently in circulation), “Shade of Blue Trees.”

I wanted to see how far I could take imagery and metaphor to convey emotion; the language is intentionally heady and saturating, leaping and lyrical. Over the last few years, I had a long, slow recovery from major surgeries. It made me hyper-aware of my body and its limitations. The poem focuses on the body’s trials, of what it can and cannot heal from: injury, abuse, illness, addiction, aging/death. It’s a long poem with a challenging format. Meghan Maloney-Vinz and Dylan Cole deserve special thanks for their commitment to getting this right.

2. What excites you as a writer? What turns you off, makes you turn away or stop reading a piece of writing?

I love great language and sounds, interesting forms that support or extend the poem, clever titles that do the work they should, what’s not said, reticence, a choice volta, otherworldliness, strange beauty, landings that either detonate, utterly surprise me, or teach me something new. There’s a terrific quote from Alberto Álvaro Ríos: “The best line in a poem better be the line I’m reading.” I often think of this when reading, writing, and revising. I’m not interested in predictability, zero emotion, talky poems, or abstraction to the point of obstruction.

3. What are some themes/topics that are important to your writing?

Grief, loss, the body, and the natural world are big themes in my past work and will be there in some way or another in the future. I gravitate toward exploring subjects that take a long time to unknot or don’t rectify themselves in a linear fashion. We’ve recently discovered my eldest son has a very serious life-threatening medical condition. I know when I’m ready the unbelievable shock and unfathomable worry of this will make its way to the page, but not now. I still feel I’m holding my breath or will wake from the worst dream.

4. Do you practice any other art forms? If so, do these influence your writing and/or creative process?  

Once upon a time I was going to be an art historian, and my connection to visual art has been strong from my earliest memories. In no particular order, art, poetry, music, and nature are my key creative touchstones, essential to how I make sense of things. Throughout my adult life I’ve been experimenting with painting, collage/assemblage, photography, and, back in the day, I played drums daily. Last year I started making visual poetry/erasures and a new avenue opened; a great discovery for me. When not writing, the other arts keep me happy but not fulfilled in the same way poetry does. I’m happiest when making something, working with my hands. I think it’s why all my poems are written and revised in longhand; the physical act of writing, ink on the page, is a joy I’ve embraced since childhood. All of these outlets help train and hopefully deepen my patience and observational skills. One feeds into the other. Everything fills the well.

5. What does your creative process look like? How does the environment you are in shape your work or where do you like to write?

Sometimes I write every day for a stretch and then won’t write again for several months. If snippets, threads, or lines come, I take those down immediately (notepads in the car, shower, kitchen, etc). If something starts to haunt me, I sit down, preferably in the morning, and see what happens. Whatever is making the most noise gets priority. The majority of my writing takes place either when my house is quiet or if I go on a retreat once or twice a year. We are a family of four in a small house—one son is at college but comes home often, another is in high school, and my extremely supportive husband. It’s challenging to carve out time and some weeks or seasons work better than others. It’s a constant balance between family life and solitude, and I protect my writing and quiet time fiercely. And candlelight is very important; all year long, it is a true comfort.

Kelly Cressio-Moeller is the associate editor of Glass Lyre Press. She’s had work published in North American Review, Salamander, THRUSH, Menacing Hedge, and elsewhere. Her poetry has been nominated for Pushcart Prizes, Best New Poets, and Best of the Net. Her full-length manuscript “Shade of Blue Trees” is out in circulation. Visit Kelly’s website at www.kellycressiomoeller.com.

PASTE TEXT HERE; FORMAT AS NEEDED

Pin It on Pinterest